<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Right Answer to the Trap Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jthawes.com/2009/03/11/the-right-answer-to-the-trap-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jthawes.com/2009/03/11/the-right-answer-to-the-trap-question/</link>
	<description>Helping Smart People Think Clearly About Strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 09:41:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry McDonough</title>
		<link>http://blog.jthawes.com/2009/03/11/the-right-answer-to-the-trap-question/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry McDonough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomhawes.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,

This is a &quot;great&quot; article.  I can surely relate to being in the trap question situation.  I&#039;m going to suggest an additional answer that I&#039;ve found useful --and this depends a lot on who is asking the question and what your relationship is with this executive and, of course, what you think their _real_ purpose for asking the question is (like you suggested in the article).  Sometimes you can tell that they&#039;re sincere and really want to know what you think about that that particular situation that sparked their question.  Other times, it&#039;s politically motivated and you realize that you&#039;re just a pawn in a war between giants.

So, what&#039;s my alternative?  If you&#039;re feeling confident enough in your existing analysis and don&#039;t suspect political undertones, you can look them straight in the eye and say confidently and slowly, &quot;I don&#039;t know, but it&#039;s something we need to figure out&quot;.  This is actually ok, because if they&#039;re sincere in their question, they don&#039;t know either.  And the better the question, the better the chance that no one else knows the answer either.  Honesty, as you&#039;ve pointed out, trumps everything.  You can also explore some dimension of the question (like the acquisition) and reply:  &quot;There are a lot of dimensions to that question to consider.  For instance the acquisition and what the parent company&#039;s strategy is...&quot;  Finishing with, &quot;That question requires a lot more thought&quot;

There are a lot of ways to answer the trap correctly, but none of them involve a bluff when the room is full of senior execs --I can&#039;t agree more with you on that one!

Great topic!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>This is a &#8220;great&#8221; article.  I can surely relate to being in the trap question situation.  I&#8217;m going to suggest an additional answer that I&#8217;ve found useful &#8211;and this depends a lot on who is asking the question and what your relationship is with this executive and, of course, what you think their _real_ purpose for asking the question is (like you suggested in the article).  Sometimes you can tell that they&#8217;re sincere and really want to know what you think about that that particular situation that sparked their question.  Other times, it&#8217;s politically motivated and you realize that you&#8217;re just a pawn in a war between giants.</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s my alternative?  If you&#8217;re feeling confident enough in your existing analysis and don&#8217;t suspect political undertones, you can look them straight in the eye and say confidently and slowly, &#8220;I don&#8217;t know, but it&#8217;s something we need to figure out&#8221;.  This is actually ok, because if they&#8217;re sincere in their question, they don&#8217;t know either.  And the better the question, the better the chance that no one else knows the answer either.  Honesty, as you&#8217;ve pointed out, trumps everything.  You can also explore some dimension of the question (like the acquisition) and reply:  &#8220;There are a lot of dimensions to that question to consider.  For instance the acquisition and what the parent company&#8217;s strategy is&#8230;&#8221;  Finishing with, &#8220;That question requires a lot more thought&#8221;</p>
<p>There are a lot of ways to answer the trap correctly, but none of them involve a bluff when the room is full of senior execs &#8211;I can&#8217;t agree more with you on that one!</p>
<p>Great topic!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bear</title>
		<link>http://blog.jthawes.com/2009/03/11/the-right-answer-to-the-trap-question/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomhawes.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Thought provoking and great article. Many thanks for taking the time to write this.  I am part of your network of connections at LinkedIn and a member of the Linked 2 Leadership Group.  Be well!

Be well!

Mark Bear
General Motors SFE
Organizational Consultant/Facilitator
Business Development Specialist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Thought provoking and great article. Many thanks for taking the time to write this.  I am part of your network of connections at LinkedIn and a member of the Linked 2 Leadership Group.  Be well!</p>
<p>Be well!</p>
<p>Mark Bear<br />
General Motors SFE<br />
Organizational Consultant/Facilitator<br />
Business Development Specialist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

