Home About Services Blog TOC References Contact
Feb
26

Six Ways to Kill Competitive Intelligence

Tom Hawes Competitive Intelligence 2009-02-26

There are many things to do to be successful in a competitive intelligence (CI) function. There are some things that will likely doom an effort. When working in CI it is important to understand  both perspectives. That is, there are things to ensure and things to avoid.

Here is my list of things to do to “doom” a competitive intelligence effort. It behooves a person involved to work to avoid these circumstances if they want to be successful.

  • Bury it in the organization – This is a failure indication because it means that the CI likely has little access to management and what they are thinking. Sometimes this happens when the CI is seen primarily as a sales and marketing tool rather than as a strategy enabler.
  • Concentrate on tactical questions – A CI function gets few chances to establish its value. Given limited resources and time, tactical issues can consume all of the available capacity. This will limit the strategic impact of the CI and be of less value to those that need to sponsor the effort.
  • Highly filter information in both directions – It is difficult to provide perfect information or anticipate all that is needed. Excessive filtering means that there is little ongoing calibration between CI people and management. Without calibration, it is likely that the CI effort will diverge from what is most important to management.
  • Focus on undifferentiated information – It is easy to accumulate information. It is harder to provide insight that is useful. As the quantity of information increases and the insight decreases, the value of CI is lessened.
  • Staff with people that have little credibility in the organization – People trust people. At least, they trust certain people. The CI function must be trusted and valued for their insights. Without that credibility, information, reports and analyses will be ignored.
  • Avoid measuring its value – At the end of the day, competitive intelligence is an overhead function. Its value will always be debated and the function will be subject to elimination without measurement of its impact. A profession CI person will regularly be seeking quantitative and qualitative feedback from management about the impact of their effort.

See my presentation on Competitive Intelligence Lessons at http://tinyurl.com/dbuyb7.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
No votes yet.
Please wait...
Competitive Intelligence, failure signs, six ways
Address: https://blog.jthawes.com/2009/02/26/six-ways-to-kill-competitive-intelligence/
« 10 Steps for Successful Competitive Intelligence
It's Not The Quills (Analysis Poverty) »
Trackback

6 comments until now

  1. NUNU GENIUS @ 2009-02-28 10:16

    great article, sure i’ll be back.

    good day

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
  2. Bonnie Hohhof @ 2009-03-06 18:32

    We’ve also found that these are all effective ways to kill CI in an organization. One area that I’d add to your 4th point:

    Answer the question you’re asked instead of identifying the actual decision being made.

    You can also find additional information on competitive intelligence at the SCIP website, http://www.scip.org

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
  3. Six Ways to Kill Competitive Intelligence « Strategically Thinking | Business Commando @ 2009-03-20 13:09

    […] http://tomhawes.wordpress.com/2009/02/26/six-ways-to-kill-competitive-intelligence […]

  4. ellendnaylor @ 2009-03-22 00:58

    These are good points, Tom. In my experience, I learned that starting with tactical was a good stepping stone to strategic CI, especially in large companies. You need to build trust and a track record. Also in these tough times, companies are looking for results, and they’re easier to affect with sales, for example helping close more deals.

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
  5. Tom Hawes @ 2009-03-22 21:53

    Ellen,

    Thanks for your comments. I agree that sometimes CI work has to be tactical and that business development can take precedence over longer term strategy during tough times. I am going to add some more thoughts as to when tactical focuses are important. Stay tuned and let me know what you think after my next blog entry.

    — Tom

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
  6. ellendnaylor @ 2009-03-23 14:05

    Hi Tom,

    Good I’ll look forward to reading your ideas and did you say you’ll be at SCIP in Chicago next month? If so I would like to meet you. http://www.thecisource.com for my contact info.

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...

Add your comment now

  • Archives

    • November 2010 (1)
    • September 2010 (4)
    • August 2010 (1)
    • July 2010 (3)
    • June 2010 (1)
    • May 2010 (5)
    • April 2010 (5)
    • March 2010 (4)
    • February 2010 (4)
    • January 2010 (6)
    • December 2009 (2)
    • November 2009 (2)
    • October 2009 (7)
    • September 2009 (6)
    • August 2009 (11)
    • July 2009 (9)
    • June 2009 (12)
    • May 2009 (6)
    • April 2009 (4)
    • March 2009 (12)
    • February 2009 (5)
  • Categories

    • Competitive Intelligence (94)
    • Early Warning (6)
    • Maintenance (1)
    • Organizational Development (13)
    • Strategy Effectiveness (56)
  • Recent Posts

    • The Hard Sell – Strategy to an Experimenter
    • Can You Answer This Question?
    • Competitive Intelligence’s Just Do Its
    • You Know What It is Like When …
    • The Three Basic Competitive Intelligence Questions
  • Tag Cloud

    alignment analysis analytical techniques Apple business strategy case studies change Chris Zook CI techniques Competitive Intelligence competitive priorities consulting decision making Early Warning effective presentations failure signs future focus gap analysis HP integrity leaks management Marketing Michael Porter news people product marketing professional competence SCIP senior management SMB strategic imperatives strategy strategy;report card;vision;change artist Strategy Effectiveness strategy evaluation strategy implementation substitutes success measures survey SWOT tactics tools trademarks trap question
Strategically Thinking · coogee theme · 2008
RSS Feed · WordPress · TOP