Home About Services Blog TOC References Contact
Feb
25

7 Rules for Strategists

Tom Hawes Organizational Development 2009-02-25

Anyone that has worked on strategy issues for any length of time has faced criticisms. Sometimes these criticisms are meaningful disagreements about the conclusions of the strategy processes. At other times, there are expressed and unexpressed criticisms of the strategists and the kind of work that they do.

One criticism is that strategists (especially those with a long term perspective) are not sufficiently coupled to the near term requirements to produce measurable business results. Often this criticism comes from those that are charged with and measured by those results. They can perceive that the strategist is unconcerned with what is most important to their livelihood.

The strategist’s counter argument is that they are greatly concerned about the company’s results and that concern is what drives their efforts to discover, define and communicate the “next big thing”.  Interestingly, the near term focus of others can be viewed as shortsighted and petty.

Of course, both views have some merit and are played out every day in organizations. The competition for resources and the right to make decisions for the business encourage the clash in perspectives. In my experience, there is no way to avoid such competition. It has become more apparent to me that rather than having the elimination of the conflict as a goal, the more useful approach is to harness the energies of both groups to produce a superior solution.

My specific interest is from the strategist’s viewpoint. It seems to me that there are several imperatives for a successful strategist to thrive in the inevitable tussles within the organization.

Here are my 7 rules.

1. The strategy effort must have the support of decision making managers of the business. Strategy cannot long prosper if it is treated or executed like a minor function.

2. The strategy must accurately reflect the thinking of the leaders of the organization. After all, it is their ultimate responsibility to deliver results.

3. The strategy process must be transparent so as to encourage meaningful debate. All stakeholders must understand how and when they can contribute to the strategy.

4. The strategist must be skilled at communicating the strategy to all levels of the organization and to the external audiences that are affected. The best strategy that is poorly communicated will be crippled from its beginning.

5. The strategist must effectively and appropriately involve those with near term focuses so that their concerns are integrated in the resultant strategies. A lack of contributory ownership has doomed many a strategy when it came time to execute the strategy.

6. There must be an on-going effort to measure the value of the strategy. Eventually this is profit, revenue, market share and the like. However, there are other measures such as organizational alignment, rapid competitive responses, well developed marketing communications, etc., that can be driven from effective strategies in advance of quantitative results.

7. The strategy effort must have a defined budget much as many firms allocate a percentage of revenue to R&D efforts. The budget and reporting structure must be separate from that of the near term focused activities. Without the separation, it is often tempting to minimize the strategy efforts to maximize near term results (which may sacrifice long term competitiveness).

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
No votes yet.
Please wait...
Address: https://blog.jthawes.com/2009/02/25/7-rules-for-strategists/
« Strategists Maturity Levels
10 Steps for Successful Competitive Intelligence »
Trackback

3 comments until now

  1. Alan S Michaels @ 2009-02-26 00:52

    Nice list. A suggestion for one more:

    #8. A strategist (at the corporate, group or business unit level) should play the role of a strategy process expert or business strategy expert – and not try to mix the two roles because politics and human nature will not allow comingling the two.

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
  2. Tom Hawes @ 2009-02-26 01:03

    Alan,

    I like your distinction. It gets very confusing if the same person is playing both roles in the same setting. I have found it important to announce (and then adhere to) the role that I was playing to avoid confusion in any specific instance. Depending on the scope of the strategist, it may well serve him or her to pick one role “permanently”.

    — Tom

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...
  3. Les 7 règles du bon stratège… | Competitive Business @ 2009-03-02 15:24

    […] un excellent billet du blog de Tom Hawes, on peut découvrir les 7 grandes régles du bon […]

Add your comment now

  • Archives

    • November 2010 (1)
    • September 2010 (4)
    • August 2010 (1)
    • July 2010 (3)
    • June 2010 (1)
    • May 2010 (5)
    • April 2010 (5)
    • March 2010 (4)
    • February 2010 (4)
    • January 2010 (6)
    • December 2009 (2)
    • November 2009 (2)
    • October 2009 (7)
    • September 2009 (6)
    • August 2009 (11)
    • July 2009 (9)
    • June 2009 (12)
    • May 2009 (6)
    • April 2009 (4)
    • March 2009 (12)
    • February 2009 (5)
  • Categories

    • Competitive Intelligence (94)
    • Early Warning (6)
    • Maintenance (1)
    • Organizational Development (13)
    • Strategy Effectiveness (56)
  • Recent Posts

    • The Hard Sell – Strategy to an Experimenter
    • Can You Answer This Question?
    • Competitive Intelligence’s Just Do Its
    • You Know What It is Like When …
    • The Three Basic Competitive Intelligence Questions
  • Tag Cloud

    alignment analysis analytical techniques Apple business strategy case studies change Chris Zook CI techniques Competitive Intelligence competitive priorities consulting decision making Early Warning effective presentations failure signs future focus gap analysis HP integrity leaks management Marketing Michael Porter news people product marketing professional competence SCIP senior management SMB strategic imperatives strategy strategy;report card;vision;change artist Strategy Effectiveness strategy evaluation strategy implementation substitutes success measures survey SWOT tactics tools trademarks trap question
Strategically Thinking · coogee theme · 2008
RSS Feed · WordPress · TOP