Without a doubt, there have been two dominant strategic business themes in the last eighteen months. First, wherever and however possible, reduce costs. Companies have rushed to reduce staffs, shutter factories and delay R&D spending. Conserving cash during the recent credit crises has been a paramount concern. The second major theme (which is gaining steam) is to grow revenue and profit. The tension between the two themes is apparent. Often growth requires some kind of incremental (or, at least, reallocated) investment.

Although competitive intelligence might help with cost saving decisions, its better use is to support strategic growth decisions. After all, strategy is forward-looking, intimately concerned with competitiveness and inseparable from significant risk/reward decisions.

It is easy to find books on growth strategy -many more, in fact, than for competitive intelligence. However, this disparity in academic or executive treatment does not obviate or lessen the need for competitive intelligence. Indeed, strategy books are replete with references to the role of competitive intelligence in strategic decision-makings.

Take an example from Chris Zook’s series of books on growth strategy. In three books – Profit from the Core, Beyond the Core and Unstoppable – Zook synthesizes ten principles of core growth and redefinition.

1. Start by Defining the Core
2. Obsess on the Full Potential of the Core
3. Fully Value Leadership Economics
4. Map Out Adjacencies to the Core
5. Recognize the Power of Repeatability in the Core
6. When Lost, Return to the Core Customer
7. Remember the Focus-Expand-Redefine Cycle of Growth
8. Exploit the Power of Hidden Assets
9. Think of Capabilities as the Building Blocks of Renewal
10. Don’t Underestimate the Power of Focus

A CEO faces a decision about whether to make an investment in a new product line that requires significant capital. Does he need any competitive intelligence?

A General Manager must decide the complete range of activities to implement to enter a new market segment. Does she need competitive intelligence?

The Marketing vice president struggles to clarify the winning proposition for the key brand of the company. Does his organization need competitive intelligence?

It is easy to answer “yes” to these scenarios. Each decision-maker faces choices that affect their organizations and, ultimately, influence their chances for success. However, the choices are rarely simple. For example, favoring one approach means that another must be deemphasized leading to disruptions in the organizational roles and responsibilities. Changes often imply new investments, processes and skills. These things cost precious money, time and energy that must be deducted from a finite “bank” within the company. Moreover, other stakeholders assert their importance along vectors independent of competition. For instance, owners, regulatory agencies, communities and others regularly inject their priorities into the mix considered by senior managers.

Since competitive intelligence is only one of the voices in the mix, how can it be effective (and not be unwisely drowned out)?

Here are three ideas to consider.

When a medical professional examines someone in the emergency room, he or she looks for signs of physical distress. How is the patient breathing? What about their skin color? Are their eyes dilated? Where are the visible signs of trauma? All of this (and more) is necessary to know before treating the person. After all, applying the wrong treatment can be more harmful than ignoring the physical distress.

Companies experience distress.

You do not have to look far to see signs of that distress. Talk with people that have survived a series of layoffs and reorganizations. Ask them about the constant worry of losing their jobs while coping with a series of changed assignments. Question them about the difficulty of trying to do ordinary business when management has severely reduced their flexibility to spend money or take risks. Watch how people talk about the future and their hopes. When you do these things, you begin to see severe distress.

Strategy and competitive intelligence organizations are suffering.

Within companies today, the current priority for many is simple survival. There is no shame, of course, with this objective. It does force hard decisions. One decision is to focus maniacally on preserving cash. That means two things – reduce expenses to the barebones and pursue short-term sales. Consequently, other things suffer. For example, many curtail or deemphasize strategy and competitive intelligence. This produces a specific kind of distress.

Here are five signs of business strategy or competitive intelligence distress.

1. Read the rest of this entry

When you get two people together that speak no common languages, communication is difficult. Sometimes, recognition of the miscommunication happens quickly. One person tries (in their own language) to ask if the other person understands what they are saying. In the opposite direction, the same question (in the second person’s language) follows sincerely puzzled looks from both people.

What happens next?

You probably have been in these situations when seemingly the only resort is to use sign language. Our hands start waving and fingers start pointing. Occasionally, accompanying the gestures, we speak slower and louder as if that makes the language clearer. Through the pantomime, amazingly, we often get enough information to take our next step. Inefficient and fraught with negative possibilities, nevertheless it sometimes works.

How valuable would a translator be at those times?

Pretty valuable, because their expert services would significantly reduce the risk of misunderstanding. Both parties would walk away more confident that they have been understood. Whatever the next steps, they would not be left hanging with a question of whether or not they had made the best choice based on the clearest information (something that a good translation could have easily provided).

Business communications and its issues are not much different.